Research · Impact

The 2 sigma problem.

One-to-one tutoring can lift the average student above 98% of a normal classroom. Benjamin Bloom proved it in 1984, then showed that no school could ever afford to give it to everyone.

2σ

In 1984, the educational psychologist Benjamin S. Bloom published a short paper with an outsized finding.

Students taught one-to-one, using mastery learning, performed about two standard deviations better than students in an ordinary one-teacher-to-thirty classroom. The average tutored student ended up above roughly 98 percent of the conventional class, an effect rarely seen in education research.

There was a catch. A private tutor for every child is far too expensive to provide at scale. So Bloom named the real challenge of finding a group method of instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring: the "2 sigma problem." It's stayed open ever since.

Educational ResearcherVol. 13 · No. 6 · June–July 1984
Article · pp. 4–16

The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring

Benjamin S. Bloom

The University of Chicago

Abstract — Under one-to-one tutoring with mastery learning, the average student performed about two standard deviations above the average of a conventional class of thirty — better than 98 percent of those students. Because individual tutoring cannot practically be provided to every learner, the problem set here is to find group methods of instruction that approach the same effect.

A rendering of Bloom's 1984 paper, not a scan.
Bloom's finding1984
Bloom's finding: one-to-one tutoring shifts achievement about two standard deviations higher+2σConventional classone teacher · thirty studentsOne-to-one tutoringwith mastery learningachievement →

The tutored curve sits about two standard deviations to the right. In plain terms: the average one-to-one tutored student outperformed about 98% of students in the conventional class.

≈2σ
better than a conventional class
98th
percentile the average tutored student reached
1:1
the format Bloom measured

Benjamin S. Bloom, "The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring," Educational Researcher, Vol. 13, No. 6 (June–July 1984), pp. 4–16.

Built to close the gap

How Sophie is built to solve it.

Sophie takes Bloom's blueprint, one-to-one mastery-based tutoring, and does the one thing he couldn't: makes it affordable for everyone.

A child's sunlit study desk with an open notebook, a mug and a small plant.
1

One-to-one, on the real paper

What Bloom's tutors had was sight of one student's own reasoning, corrected on the spot. Sophie reads the actual paper on the desk as your child writes, so a wrong turn gets caught in the moment, not a week later on a returned test.

Sparks of understanding rising from an open book, the moment an idea clicks.
2

Mastery before moving on

The other half of Bloom's result was mastery learning: check, correct, and don't advance until the idea holds. Sophie tracks every concept your child has actually mastered and circles back to the shaky ones, instead of marching through a syllabus on schedule.

Many small figures across soft hills, each under their own gentle light, a tutor for every family.
3

Scale Bloom couldn't reach

Sophie makes this level of attention affordable and always on. A personal tutor within reach of every family, not only the few who could hire one.

The gap, closing

Sophie is how the 2 sigma problem finally gets solved: a personal tutor for every family.

We're early, and don't yet claim a measured 2σ result. Closing that gap, for every child and not only the fortunate few, is what Sophie is built to do.